What is a de jure company director?

A de jure company director is a person formally appointed to a company in accordance with legal requirements, including proper documentation and filing with Companies House. This role establishes the director’s responsibilities and accountability within the company, distinguishing them from de facto and shadow directors who lack formal appointment.

Profile picture of Rachel Craig.

Written by

6 minute read Last Updated:

Determining whether someone is a legally appointed director is straightforward in most UK companies, but confusion can arise when you hear the term ‘de jure company director’. What does it mean? Are all company directors de jure, or does the term only apply to executive and managing directors?

We explain what it means to be a de jure director, whether all types of directors are classified as such, and the difference between de jure and de facto directors.

De jure company directors explained

De jure is the Latin expression for ‘by law’ or ‘by right’, which goes a small way to explaining the meaning of the term ‘de jure company director’.

Simply, a de jure director is a person who has been formally appointed to the board and registered as a director at Companies House in accordance with the Companies Act 2006 and the articles of association. 

This means that:

  • The person has consented to act as a director of the company. 
  • The document containing the person’s appointment has been completed and filed at Companies House – form IN01 for an appointment during the company formation process, or form AP01 for an appointment after incorporation.
  • The company passed the necessary resolution to appoint the director (post-incorporation requirement only).
  • If applicable, minutes of the meeting at which the resolution was passed were taken and filed in accordance with company law and the articles.
  • The director’s details are publicly available on the register of companies.
  • The director has an official role within the company, and they are legally responsible for the actions they perform. 

It is also possible to appoint a corporate body as a de jure director, provided that the necessary steps have been followed and the company also has at least one natural director. To appoint a corporate director after incorporation, the company must complete and file form AP02 rather than form AP01. 

A de jure company director is sometimes informally referred to as a ‘registered director’, a ’director in law’, or a ‘true director’.  

What responsibilities does a de jure director have?

Since limited company directors are responsible for managing a company’s day-to-day affairs, they must adhere to various duties prescribed by (where applicable):

  • The Companies Act 2006
  • A company’s articles of association
  • A shareholders’ agreement 
  • Directors’ contracts of employment or service agreements
  • Resolutions passed by the company’s members (i.e. shareholders’ formal decisions)

Under the Companies Act 2006 (sections 171 to 177), all directors must comply with the following seven general duties of directors: 

  1. Act within their powers in accordance with the company’s articles of association 
  2. Promote the company’s success for the benefit of its members as a whole
  3. Exercise independent judgment
  4. Exercise reasonable care, skill, and diligence in their role
  5. Avoid or manage conflicts of interest that may affect their objectivity 
  6. Not accepting benefits from any third parties 
  7. Declare direct or indirect interests in any proposed transactions or arrangements with the company

Beyond these statutory duties, many companies also define directors’ collective or individual responsibilities and decision-making powers in shareholders’ agreements, members’ resolutions, service agreements or employment contracts.

Difference between a de jure director and a de facto director 

Unlike a de jure director, a de facto director is not formally appointed to a company or registered at Companies House, but they perform many similar duties, such as signing contracts and making decisions on the company’s behalf. 

Essentially, a de facto director assumes the status and duties of a director ‘in fact’, even though they have not been properly appointed as a director. 

Are executive and managing directors de jure?

Executive and managing directors are de jure directors. These two senior roles are broadly similar, and there is no legal distinction in company law, but there are important differences in practice.

An executive director is appointed by a company, sits on the board of directors, is responsible for some or all of the company’s day-to-day management activities and strategy, and is usually a full-time employee.

  • Appointing a new company director
  • Are company directors liable for its debts?
  • The role and responsibilities of a limited company director
  • The managing director (sometimes called a chief executive officer or CEO) is usually the most senior director, responsible for managing the company’s activities and strategic direction full time under the direction of the board and shareholders.

    Are non-executive directors de jure?

    A non-executive director (NED) is a director with a particular expertise who assists executive and managing directors with a specific area or challenge within the company. 

    They often work part-time in the role, so they don’t tend to oversee or assist with general day-to-day business activities. Nevertheless, non-executive directors are considered de jure because they are formally appointed and registered at Companies House.

    Are alternate directors considered de jure?

    An alternate director is an individual who steps in to substitute for a director who will be incapacitated for a period of time (e.g., if they are unwell or on vacation). The alternate will act on the director’s behalf during their absence. 

    Alternate directors are considered de jure because they must be formally appointed to the company and registered at Companies House. However, the use of alternative directors must be permitted under the company’s articles of association.

    Is a shadow director a de jure director?

    Section 251 of the Companies Act 2006 defines a shadow director as “a person in accordance with whose directions or instructions the directors of the company are accustomed to act.” However, unlike a de facto director, a shadow director does not perform those actions personally – rather, they exert influence and control over the board. 

    Some examples of a shadow director include:

    • A majority shareholder who gives instructions to the directors but has no direct involvement in the company’s management.
    • A person who participates actively in board meetings, regularly secures loans or borrowings on the company’s behalf, approves expenditures, or is responsible for a specific area of the business (e.g. finances) 

    In practice, a shadow director usually acts behind the scenes, often because something prevents their formal appointment as a company director.

    Is a nominee director considered de jure?

    A nominee director is a person nominated by a shareholder or other person or body to represent their interests on a company’s board of directors. They may be a de jure director or a de facto director. 

    An example of when a nominee director may be used is during a joint venture, where the shareholders of each party to the joint venture company appoint a nominee to represent them on the new company’s board of directors. 

    Summary of different directors’ de jure status

    Type of director   Considered de jure?  
     Registered director  Yes
     Executive or managing director  Yes
     De facto director  No
     Non-executive director  Yes
    Alternate director   Yes
     Shadow director   No
     Nominee director   Sometimes 

    De jure, de facto, or shadow director – why does it matter?

    It all comes down to accountability. If the company is involved in any wrongdoing and the board is found to have breached its duties, the de jure directors would be held responsible and considered personally liable.

    However, if a court decides that de facto or shadow directors were in place, those directors would be liable for any misconduct that occurred.

    By recognising the existence of de facto and shadow directors, courts can decide who is ultimately culpable and should shoulder any blame.

    Need to appoint a director?

    We hope you’ve found this post helpful. Please comment below if you have any questions, or get in touch if you need help appointing or removing a company director.

    With our Director Appointment & Resignation Service (available for only £29.99), we will prepare the appointment letter and board resolution, and submit the necessary appointment documents to Companies House. This ensures any new director is de jure.

    Please note that the information provided in this article is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, tax, or professional advice. While our aim is that the content is accurate and up to date, it should not be relied upon as a substitute for tailored advice from qualified professionals. We strongly recommend that you seek independent legal and tax advice specific to your circumstances before acting on any information contained in this article. We accept no responsibility or liability for any loss or damage that may result from your reliance on the information provided in this article. Use of the information contained in this article is entirely at your own risk.

    About The Author

    Profile picture of Rachel Craig.

    Rachel is a Senior Technical Writer with Rapid Formations and is responsible for the successful delivery and development of our products. Joining the company in 2013, Rachel is recognised as an expert in this industry and is highly knowledgeable in company formation, corporate compliance, and company law.

    Share This Post

    Related Posts

    Join The Discussion